Search for: "ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION et al v. DOE" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
Decided on November 24, 2009 No. 178 [*1]In the Matter of Daniel Goldstein, et al., Appellants, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:31 am
District Courts for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Arista Records LLC et al v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:52 pm
District Courts for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Virgin Records America Inc et al v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:38 am
Following that dismissal the same counsel filed at least three separate cases in this court: Atlantic Recording Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Appellate court lacks jurisdiction of appeal of final judgment where no notice of appeal was filed within thirty days of date judgment was final and appealable -- Motion for supplemental final judgment was not an authorized and timely motion that would suspend rendition of final judgment -- Supplemental final judgment ruling on entitlement to attorney's fees is not final or appealable where amount to be awarded has not been determined
CATALINA HALNAT, LLC, et… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
SECREST et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2 et al., Defendants and Respondents.No. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Michael Punke nominates as WTO Ambassador (Intellectual Property Watch) Disney acquires Marvel – IP contention ensues (Copyfight) (IP finance)   US Patent Reform Mike Drummon, Editor-in-Chief of Inventors Digest Magazine, joins innovators for patent reform (IP Watchdog)   US Patents Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]